Some animals by their nature create and maintain biological diversity, making ecosystems stable and productive. The Pleistocene era, with its variety of
megafauna,
is the epitome of such ecological diversity. Restoring large creatures
to the natural landscape can bring forth in the modern world such recreated
environments of great ecological diversity and complexity.
Pleistocene Extinction & Resurrection
The Pleistocene epoch ended about 10,000 years ago. It was marked
by great temperature fluctuations. Ice ages, with
extensive glacial periods, were followed by warmer inter-glacial periods. An immense
variety of large mammals (megafauna) inhabited the earth during this
period. Various reasons have been proposed for the Pleistocene megafauna
extinction. Details of this extinction event are discussed
here.
Scientists within the last decades have advanced
justification for a Pleistocene rebirth in North America. They advocate
the reintroduction of large animals inNorth America as part of a
resurrection ecology. A Harvard professor in 2013 introduced a
rationale for actually resurrecting extinct megafauna through DNA manipulation.
Two hundred years in the future, the illustration above could be a scene in a future wilderness in western North America. The death race between two of
the fastest mammals on earth has not occurred for 10,000 years. The crucial aspect of
the painting is renewing a broken relationship of predator and prey, the
reestablishment of an ancient bond.
European Initiative
 |
| Wisent, the European Bison |
Europe, with so many close living relatives of its extinct megafauna, has been taking a leadership role in the actual
reintroduction and protection of large animals.
Surprisingly, one of Europe's smallest countries, the
Netherlands has taken the biggest step in Western Europe to create a
living wilderness with a megafauna dominated ecology. This
Oostvaardersplassen lies below sea level and its current 15,000 acres includes 3000 roaming wild horses, red deer and long-horned wild cattle.
The
European Bison is subject of a Europe-wide effort to bring back this species from virtual extinction. The
Wildland Research Institute in the United Kingdom aims to recreate wildlands and return exterminated species to Britain. Large herbivores have been
advocated as a means to reduce wildfire danger in Mediterranean Europe. In Russia there is an ongoing effort to create an actual
Pleistocene Park in Yakutia.
Candidate Species
 |
| White Rhinos - Gerald and Buff Corsi © California Academy of Sciences |
Megafauna (nonbirds weighing more than five kilograms) in the new 'pleistocene' wildernesses will include:
- Existing native species,
- Species extirpated in most of their original range (such as the Grizzly Bear in California),
- Analogue species (an animal that can stand
in for an unavailable one) such as the North American Cheetah, in order
to create an approximate restoration of an ecosystem or
-
Regenerated megafauna from
DNA (eg; Woolly Mammoth). Cloning extinct species could be a real possibility in the near future.
Benefits
A number of benefits accrue to this
Pleistocene rewilding, such as:
Caution Advised
 |
| Brush Rabbit, H Graem © 2006 |
There are ugly stories of man bringing exotic creatures to new
lands, resulting in the local ecology being obliterated by the
invaders. Witness rats, cats or goats on ocean islands or the rabbit scourge in Australia. Note the wiping out of the native birds on Guam by the Brown Tree Snake.
Most of these exotic invaders were relatively small in size,
breed up to large numbers very quickly and natural predators (such as
the fox for the rabbit in Australia) may create new unintended
consequences on the native fauna. The adverse impacts on the native
ecology, especially in situations like Australia where the native
mammal ecology (based on marsupials) is ill equiped to compete with the
invaders, can be devastating.
An obvious question is presented by the pleistocene wilderness
approach. How does the current proposal, to introduce megafauna missing
from the local ecology, avoid such dangers?
One difference is that the current proposal is for the introduction of megafauna,
not the smaller, more prolific rats, rabbits, cats, foxes, snakes and
similar animals that have devastated unique ecological habitats.
Additionally, as the new megafauna acclimates and becomes established
with sufficient numbers in its new home, the proposal is to also
introduce their predators to keep all species in balance with the
ecology.
As proposed in
Nature,
"Well-designed,
hypothesis-driven experiments will be needed to assess the impacts of
potential introductions before releases take place. Large tracts of
private land probably hold the best immediate potential for such
studies, with the fossil record and research providing guideposts and
safeguards. For example, 77,000 large mammals (most of them Asian and
African ungulates, but also cheetahs, camels and kangaroos) roam free on
Texas ranches, although their significance for conservation remains
largely unevaluated."
H Graem © 2012